What Happened Yesterday (WHY)


The universe is expanding in me, at a rate I can’t control. Try as I might I can’t keep up with myself. I can’t stop expanding long enough to organize everything. Surge me down, Goo. ~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight I guess I’m just going to have to go back to ‘no particular order’ again, and trust that wherever an entry lands it will be in the correct order.
You know those bullets gave me a lot of trouble in the previous books. Carole said that when she wanted to return to something, nothing was numbered so she couldn’t find it. Not good. I didn’t want to give any entry preferential treatment of any one thought by numbering the entries.  People are funny about numbers and what they mean to them. Number 1 as opposed to number 301; how does that look for 301? Not very important. Well, I have to start somewhere, so I might as well just start typing and figure out the bullets or numbers later. I have a lot to get through before even thinking about opening Nanny Kay’s Famous Blue suitcase.
Come on, SURGE ME DOWN, Goo.
WHY AMERICA FIRST? World leaders lose their tempers when America says ‘America First’. In their minds America is saying that all other countries don’t matter, that they come second or third or way down on the ladder or nowhere on the ladder. But doesn’t each of those complaining countries put their countries first? Of course they do. Nobody respects a father or mother who puts outsiders first, rather than their own. Nobody on earth can put outsiders first and still be considered competent and respected heads of their families. Some say, we can all be one happy world family. Just let us in, or give us your money, or your scientific and technological knowledge, open it all up to us. ‘It’s going to take too long to get what you have and we don’t want to spend all the required time catching up.’ So all these decades you all were enjoying the life of leisure swinging in your hammocks, while others, worlds away, worked to make living on earth easier and more productive for everyone. You wanted your way in your culture in your region in your time and everybody leave you alone. You didn’t want all that modern stuff. What happened? Now you do. So where have you been? Your superior/supremacist attitude held you back. Your egos, big as cave openings, wouldn’t let you out. You think the more somebody acquires the more superior they are. It’s the ones who refused to change for the purpose of moving away from the cave life who are the real supremacists. They’re the ones who thought the old way was the only right way, wanting to keep living the way they always lived.
Your culture, instead of invention, ingenuity and progress, came first. You clung to your culture like a baby clings to a blanket.
You said leave us alone; get out of our spaces. Go back from where you came. Yet here you are losing your tempers because America finally said “America First”. We didn’t put America first for a long time. We shared our knowledge; our people paid with their wages to send people with skills, knowledge and supplies to help you build your nations, but still there were too many who wanted the old life – a life where people die young, where they suffer without knowledge on how best to survive. You didn’t want to be catapulted into the modern world. The issue was the catapult; it was too sudden. But it didn’t have to be if you had stopped with all that meaningless cultural supremacy. There’s not much value in anything that comes under the label of culture. It’s a bunch of traditions that hurt more than help – in almost every instance. Everything else comes under the labels of ‘living’ and ‘progressing’ or ‘dying’.
In short, you didn’t want to do the work of it, even when you were shown how and given the tools and the funds. You still found a way to muck it up.
So what have you all done for America, except make continuous demands on America’s people, their resources, knowledge and experience? There’s a growing trend that expects America to become a welfare state absorbing the poor people of other nations, because they have more money than their countries of origin, while supplying financial aid and services to those nations of origin as well as to others. If America becomes filled with people with low paying jobs, and everybody gets the same benefits, with no incentives to create something better, how will these Americans pay enough taxes to send money and other aid to all the countries it currently subsidizes? Does Cuba send aid all over the world? How far back on the evolutionary scale of development do you want to go? How will America be a military to all countries who want protection if America can’t afford a military? Socialism can only sustain it’s own people for a limited amount of time, turning America into a welfare state capable of only sustaining itself. World leaders need to think twice before attacking the American system that helps to feed their people and keep them free by providing subsidies off the backs of the American worker. Yes. In order to keep sharing what we have with the world, we need to keep progressing and to take care of our own first. It is the citizens who pay out of their pay checks in taxes to supplement economies of over two hundred nations worldwide. Regionally, Africa receives 32 percent of all U.S. aid, followed by the Middle East at 31 percent and South and Central Asia at 25 percent. Afghanistan receives the most. In the meanwhile, all classes of working Americans subsidizing the economies of other nations, so they can survive and thrive, deserve a thank you from all those countries benefiting from their hard work and sacrifice. So, again, what have you given the hard working American people, except your demands and disrespect? Think on that.

SEX IN THE STALLS You claim to be out of the closet, but you still have sex in public restroom stalls. Why? Gay parks? I didn’t know they existed, till I moved to the West Side of Cleveland. Beautiful on-the-lake park, well-kept. Gays only. No need for a posted sign claiming dominance over this park, or that restaurant or those bars. Families can’t go to some parks on Lake Erie, because everybody’s having sex in cars – in broad daylight. Or, pick up and drop off young boys waiting to make some fast cash. Looking for a pick up? Want to state your preferred sexual style? The car says it all. Hood up. Trunk up. One or two side doors open. Four doors open. All up and open. Pick your preference. Various cars sporting various sex styles. A communique. Public restrooms, public restaurants, public parks should be public for everybody. Gays stake their claim and everybody else leaves. Why? Because of inappropriate behavior in public spaces. Non-gays don’t want to be around what most non-gays consider private, not public. There’s only one required qualification for squatting rights. Can we have sex there? Or can we pick up and drop off without incident? Out of the closet, means you don’t have to have sex there. All tax payers fund those parks. Too cheap to get a room? Don’t want to bring your recent pick-up date home to your apartment? But guess what? Gay motels exist too. What constitutes a gay motel? Motels are places people go to have sex. So what? It’s private. Isn’t it? Gays are more comfortable around their own. Just like Africans and Hispanics and Chinese, and Indian et al and women and men and children, the young, the old, the middle-aged, rich, poor, in-between. We all have our categories.
  • You thought I left out white people. White people aren’t comfortable around anyone. They are independently-minded. They don’t want to depend on anyone for their success. Why? Because they inherently don’t trust each other or anyone else.
While in public, playing the integration game, there’s a baseline behavior paradigm that everyone for everyone’s comfort abides by. Yet, segments of each group feel, think they should be able to be themselves, no matter where they be at any moment. Au naturel movements create problems, when they speak for everyone in the category through their loud, contrary actions. Stereotypes are formed by these contrarians wanting to act out out in public spaces and expect everybody else to accept who they are and how they act. Well, who you are is not necessarily how you act. Chew on that. It’s called exhibitionist behavior. That’s what non-exhibitionists avoid. Yet, gay parks, restaurants, bars, motels do exist. So stereotype or not, the facts on the ground support it. Maybe gays aren’t yet fully out of the closet and have over such a long time been groomed in the closet that they don’t understand how to act in public when out of the closet. They had to hide their sex. Coming out of the closet thus means to have sex in public. Closet=closed. Public=open. Discretion doesn’t mean using the bathroom stall instead of the bar stool. Come on. You need to be discreet in public places, just like non-gays need to be discreet in public places. If you can’t delay gratification till you get home, or to a motel, then that needs to change. The world isn’t going to keep accepting all the flaws that you are too lazy to discipline.
SAFE to GAYS in public places, actually means safe to have sex in public places – and not be negatively judged or beaten up for it.
At least be honest while you’re protesting for your rights. That’s not one of them. Reserve a stall in a public restroom?? For two people?? No.


A holocaust can be the sacrificing of one or a billion and one or more – with the feigned, always the feigned, purpose of making a better life for those not sacrificed.

The letting of the blood of a lamb, the burning of a witch, burning humans corralled in locked barns in Africa, aerial bombing of Gaza after the borders are sealed, death by concentration camps around Europe, suicide bombers, the mass slaughter of Native Americans – north and south – the slaughter of aborigines in Australia, the skinning of Albinos and Pygmies, every soldier worldwide, trained to kill the youth of another nation, medical experiments on other breeds and species, reserving the good healthy foods and medicines and medical procedures for the privileged, while giving what’s leftover to the underprivileged, and the billions slaughtered every year, that the privileged duped you into thinking would preserve you in body, mind and spirit if you ate them.

Unclench THAT fist before God unclenches it for you. That’s some high priced preservative that you’re using to line the pockets of the wealthy, while they keep you addicted to the blood.

So, where did all this slaughter get the world? Are we healthier, wealthier, wiser? Are we a world without war? Did a Native Indian girl jumping to her death from the top of a waterfall lift an evil spell, or did your conscience need to make something positive out of something horrible, so you urged her to jump to make the sun shine again?

Superstitions stem mostly from women, who aren’t allowed an education, so they make up cause and effect as they go along. Fifty-fifty – the sun will shine. We’ll win some favors from the tribe for that one. They’ll think we have magical powers – better magical powers than no powers. She was a dog anyway.

War doesn’t stop war, so why do it? After all the wars, all the holocausts, the massacres, call it what it is – mass death – we’re still warring. So, war isn’t a deterrent to war. Death isn’t a deterrent to death. Only life can deter death. No war deters war.

Do we have cures that don’t cause another equally debilitating illness? You gotta be kidding me. All these decades of medical slaughter experiments and still no cure? Man…you’ve been going down the road most travelled, and every traveler will tell you, they’re weary. Weary means nothing new. Same ol’, same ol’. So why take that road again? Get off your fat tush or skinny bones and do something different – for Your sake.

Conservatives don’t want the Federal government interfering with individual state economies, or any other areas, yet they’re the first ones to run to the Fed, when their states need money. So in essence, they want the Feds to be their personal banker, with no conditions on how they spend the money.

The Cleveland Clinic is evolving backwards to the seventies, to a diet that didn’t work then, and won’t work now. The Ketosis diet, basically the Atkins diet, high animals, low carbs and fat, put your body in a state of pre-death to lose weight. Well…yeah, most people do lose weight just before they die. So why focus on death to survive? Why, why, why? Because the slaughter industries fund the programs. Slaughter industries fund a whole lot of stuff that clinics and hospitals do. Why go around claiming to be the best, state of the art, progressive, new thinking, new age, when you’re still back in the dark ages?

You don’t have to slaughter a life to save a life. Yet, the burger joints of America have such a strong hold on, not only what we eat, but what the researchers are allowed to study, that the researchers would rather put you in a state of pre-death, so you can still eat the meat, that the burger joints dictate us to eat, all the while, dictating to the hospitals that are supposed to make you well, what diet to put you on to lose the weight they caused in the first place. Their solution? More meat. Eat more of what’s killing you, just remove the fat from it, and stop drinking liquids. Even they admit that it’s only short term. So then the people on pre-death diets, gain it all back and then some. How insane is that?

Why does Obama keep blaming the poor people in America for the collapsed economy? Bad home loans to people who couldn’t afford them. The banks didn’t loan out one million dollars a year for one million years – twice – to the poor people in the USA. [That’s the price of the bail out] If so, they’d all be rich.

The primary purpose of having a congress is to prevent a dictatorship of the executive. When the populace doesn’t trust congress, that’s a ‘tell’ that the populace is agitated. [Notice that I didn’t say, that’s a ‘tell’ that the natives are restless?]

Dylan Ratigan says that prejudiced people shouldn’t be allowed in political parties unless the political party first shames them, and the political party renounces hatred toward blacks and Jews. The party under scrutiny was the Tea Bag party. Ratigan kicked the guy he was interviewing off the stage because he refused to give a yes or no answer to whether he would do that.

Aside from the subject matter that got lost in the verbal scuffle, this was a perfect example of how not to have a conversation. Ratign justified his actions, because it was his show and the interviewee wasn’t being cooperative, in that he wasn’t answering the questions in the way Ratigan wanted them answered. Ratigan was acting like a prosecutorial attorney who owned the show, thus the context of the conversation. After he literally turned his back on the interviewee, he went on a tirade, saying, ‘this is what happens when you try to have a conversation’.

Again, subject matter aside, Ratigan was having anything but a conversation. He didn’t like the guy or his politics, so he went on the attack, claiming by his actions, his own superiority.

To affect change, having a conversation means no bullying. If you have to cry that it’s your show, and you ask the questions, and then demand that they be answered in the words you choose for the interviewee, you’ve lost your argument simply because of your method.

Now, to the subject matter. If you ban people with prejudice from political parties, then what you’re saying is that people with prejudice should be banned from voting. What you demand from one political party must be demanded from all political parties for your argument to be valid. Yet, even if the argument is valid, in that the same rules apply to everyone, the rules are still prejudicial. I’ve never heard leaders of political parties ban people with prejudice. Where do you want these prejudiced people to go – to the democratic party? You didn’t think through the argument.

Raising the roof on prejudice means exposing it, not exploding the person who harbors it.

If people with prejudice were banned, you’d have to ban everyone. Your own prejudice against people with prejudice was difficult to watch. Don’t turn your back – engage. You let your anger get the best of you. I found it interesting that you focused on blacks and Jews. If blacks wanted to be in the Tea Bag party, they’d be there. Obviously, the Tea Bag platform doesn’t appeal to them. If your demand is simply going to be to publicly shame, and then you’ve done your job, and then go on with business as usual, then what’s the point? Most blacks still won’t like their platform.

Regarding the Jews. Lots of the Tea Baggers are Jews. Aside from that, Jews are the least discriminated against people on the planet. Oh, sure, they may not be liked by a lot of people for their own personal group platform, but Jews are overall, worldwide, the most successful people on the planet. You really don’t need to cry prejudice on their behalf. What you should be doing is picking up on their prejudices.

Jews are a protected class of people in all branches of government and business – all walks of life. No other group has that kind of clout. All things get filtered through the prism of Jews, before it gets to anybody else. Every other group is inferior to that class. All policy emanates from Jews. If you catch a break, it’s because your plight was making them look bad. That’s the only reason. I have not seen one person of influence stand up to that dictatorship – an underground, above ground network, where all it takes is a phone call to ruin your life for criticizing them, not for calling them a Jew, though that’s severe enough, you know, it’s tantamount to telling the enemy where you are, but for pointing out their flaws, for that you die. That’s their bottom line.

Calm down, then break the argument down, or forget your approach altogether. You started talking about anger and rage in the USA. Yet, instead of getting heated up over the cause, you slammed the result – which got you nowhere. I understand your frustration. People answer your questions with talking points that have nothing to do with the questions asked. But, you have your own talking points. Somebody wrote your script. And somebody’s talking in your ear.

Chris Matthews is not a good role model for you. All we ever hear is his opinion. Why even have a guest, if he’s not going to let the person answer the question? It’s time to retire hardball. Everybody plays it–and all it amounts to – at the end of the day – all things being equal in a perfect world, without rushing to judgement – that it is what it is – been there done that – deja vu all over again – on so many different levels. When the other shoe drops, where the sun doesn’t shine, that’s the bottom line. If it walks like a duck, wears lipstick and if the shoe fits, then the moment of truth has arrived. The fat lady hasn’t sung yet, so it appears to be DOA – dead on arrival.

Lars Vilks aka cartoonist created nothing but trouble in his art. He’s an old Swedish Jew with a grudge against dogs and religions. One is said to be the best friend to all humans and the other, their saviors. He wanted to wipe those two bad thoughts off the face of the planet, instead he managed to get a few hundred people killed. Whoa. The power of an image. Why would anyone even want to save a guy like that? Nothing to do with him or his character or lack of integrity. It was all about Muslims – hating Muslims. Everybody  in law enforcement hates Muslims, so why not jump on this bandwagon and save the cartoonist.

Their reason was different than mine. I don’t support slaughter, period. They all do. And they all wanted to get the Muslims who were threatening to kill the cartoonist, again, not because it was Lars Vilks, but because it was the Muslims behind making the threats.

Or so they thought. The Jews sensationalized the threats against the cartoonist, because they were sure the Arabs were behind them. After all the money and human hours spent to make this prejudiced man, who has the blood of humans and dogs on his hands, safe, only to discover that the two main instigators were American women was a huge blow to Israeli pride.

The FBI can’t be very happy about this one. And both women are part Jew – double blow. I guess Lula DeSilva is going to have to rethink his blue-eyed stereotype talk. The Feds kept mentioning blond hair and blue eyes, like they were somehow evil colors. You won that one Lula, but for all the wrong reasons. Having blond hair and blue eyes is nothing to be ashamed of. People shouldn’t have to feel worried, because the color of their hair and eyes match someone else’s, who wants to raise holy hell against a cartoonist, who feels betrayed by dogs and religions, or because someone clumps all blue-eyed people with terrorism against the populace. Blue-eyed has become code for white people – or Jews, only if the shoe fits, or WASPS – or hillbillies (?) We’re all the same to some dark-eyed, dark skinned, dark haired people. They can criticize us, but we can’t criticize them. We’re those blond hair, stupid monster people, you know, the ones with straw for brains.

Rachael Maddow told us we all fit the terrorist profile – to take the focus off the Jews. There was only one being on the planet that didn’t fit the profile and that was a stuffed animal – according to Rachael. I wonder what that was code for? You may fit the profile RM, and you may even like that you fit the profile, but keep me out of your circle of terrorists. I don’t fit anybody’s profile of terror. I’m the Five Principles to Peace without prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter – which means a better life for all. Or did you not believe the principled peace part?

There are lots of peace-loving, peace-seeking people in the world, who do not fit your terrorist profile, but you don’t like that do you? The Jews want everyone to fit the profile, so they can keep spying on everyone, because in the end, you just can’t help yourselves. I say that any group that claims, not to be able to help themselves, who claims that they need an urgent intervention to keep them from blowing up themselves and the planet, need to get off the T.V. and voluntarily separate themselves from society, to keep them from harming that society.

Dogs are like people – different breeds, different temperaments, different skills, different sizes, colors, types of hair. My dog is best friend to me – not to everyone else. Why do people think that just because she’s a dog, she’s their best friend? It doesn’t work that way. She is what she is, because I am what I am, and vice versa. We have a bond and a mutual understanding, that has nothing to do with food, or the way either of us looks. Dogs are proud of who they are and what they are. Why can’t humans be that too? Why do they have to be like every other dog, in every other way?


I recall that way back in the 9-11 days, some, or maybe one (and the others who thought it, thought better about not speaking it), voiced that it must take a lot of courage to blow one’s self up, knowing the horrible death they would suffer.

That does take courage – a lot of courage. No matter how hardened you are, it takes a lot of courage, because when you’re pre-planning it, then do the ritual thing prior to the deed, getting ready for it, and everybody is supporting you (when they never did before), for the group, family, the cause, as the time draws near, it’s only you – you ending your life – a life that your family, or your group, or their political, or religious cause, says needs to be done – and they elected you to do it, even though you volunteered.

Oh, they make you think that it was your idea, and how so brave – protecting them, and the children, the generations to come. You be the sacrifice – so we all can live a better life. See you in heaven, son – daughter. Teenagers, thinking the only way they can change the world is to kill themselves so that others will live better.

Not unlike in the USA, parents being so proud of their sons and daughters who go off to war to kill or to be killed – for their parents, for the preservation of the next generation, for the family, the country, the community, the cause of freedom. After all, we can’t be free unless we’re courageous enough to kill or be killed – to slaughter or be slaughtered for our God-given right to be free.

I am recalling again, but now in the present day – not many days ago – people talking about how courageous Benjamin Netanyahu was for slaughtering the Palestinians – the Palestinians who had no way – no effective way – of defending themselves against the holocaust that he in conjunction with the USA administration and military, waged against them. But they’re trying to kill us, is what Netanyahu kept implying, as he slaughtered them – again – again – again…

It didn’t take courage for Netanyahu to bomb an entire country of people, who were actually born, bred – right there in Palestine – living there for centuries.  Recall, it’s called Palestine, where the Palestinians grew. It’s not called Israel on any old map I’ve ever seen.

It doesn’t take courage for another president of the USA to bomb Iraq – again – … It never takes courage when you’re the bully. Think about it. You see a picture of the poor and wretched in Palestine – also some rich folks. But see the difference between Israel and Palestine and any sane person would have to conclude that one of the two is enslaving the other.

It all comes down to ownership. Ownership of land, of resources, and they don’t give a flying fig about the degenerates living on the land they want to own.

The Jews for decades have been saying that they don’t want Gaza. Then why enslave the Gazan people – making sure that they never develop that land? It has nothing to do with rockets lobbed with no destination, nor teenagers throwing rocks at military tanks. Of course the Jews want Gaza’s prime real estate. A seaside resort. The Jews covet that tiny strip of land.

They don’t want peace – they want land – the more the better. It’s all about Hamas they say. It used to be all about Hezbollah. It’s always all about somebody not giving them what they want – land.

The fight to gain Jerusalem has nothing to do with a so-called Holy site – there’s nothing Holy about their agenda – they hate Jesus – want nothing to do with a Jew telling another Jew to treat the prostitutes well – to turn the other cheek at an insult – to give without expectation of a favor in return – it’s about land – and they’ll pull every rabbit out of the hat to make the world think they’re dying as a race, they’re dying due to persecution, they’re dying because they hate themselves – because the whole world hates them – and give us this God damned land – or else you’ll make us do something horrible to you.

That ‘something horrible’ is called in everybody else’s sane mind – absent theirs – a holocaust.

A holocaust for land.

ISRAEL is preparing to retake GAZA.

Ever notice that when people tell the truth about something and the one listening doesn’t like it, they accuse the teller of being angry?


Although there are random sequences in everybody’s lives, there are also staged events.

At each juncture, random or staged there is an opportunity for growth through change. Do you want to slide? That’s an option. Do you want to regress – go backward? That, believe it or not, is the most often chosen path by human creatures.


Once you choose a particular course, there is only a certain amount of facilitating that one can do without outside intervention to derail your efforts, or outside intervention to facilitate your efforts – at a price.

Sometimes a missed opportunity is better than the one taken that ends up going nowhere no matter how hard or extended the exerted effort – intervention or not.

Donald Trump did not rise to power in a vacuum. He is not a solitary person. Frankly, his biggest fans are the ones who scream at him the loudest. They are the ones who truly believe that he is the one.

Every problem he has to solve already existed long before he became President Of The United States (POTUS).

The fact that the Mockers do what they do so well is a sure indicator that they’ve been doing it for a long time – it just wasn’t made public. Something like this starts slowly and gains momentum over time – a long time.

It’s unfortunate for the status of the human creature that so many of them took the INFLICTION OF PAIN route to change the world.

Hillary Clinton would not have been able to change much, and as much as admitted it as chief negotiator – Secretary of State – under past President Obama. Even Obama couldn’t get anything done that anybody remembers. He kept aspiring to a more powerful position for the purpose of changing what needed to be changed and he just couldn’t do it.

Community organizer to State Senator to US Senator to finally President and at every level, he saw the same issues not get solved. So the more power he got made no difference whatsoever. Of course, it was always somebody else’s fault and that’s why he lives in the State Of Mockery. He didn’t have the type of personality conducive to working with people. Hillary Clinton didn’t either. They both were either angry or laughing at people.

The difference with Donald Trump is that sure he laughs at people, gets angry, but he doesn’t stop there. He even stews about it, seemingly all the time, but he still doesn’t stop there. He lives with it. He works in spite of it all. He drives right through it using a gentle demeanor. That’s his way. He doesn’t blow up what he wants to change. He works with it.

I mean, Barak Obama is still trying to be president even though he did his eight years and there’s no current provision in the law allowing it. Now he’s back to the beginning, only using tweets to get his message out, like everybody else.

Hillary Clinton still doesn’t have an original or creative thought, which makes one wonder why and how she got where she is. For someone always screaming about privilege, she’s the recipient. She became one of the good old boys whom she despised.

Putting fires out is what everybody ends up doing once they get elected.


The current trend in labeling a manufactured food, that CONTAINS NO ANIMAL PRODUCTS (CNAP), is to label it PLANT-BASED rather than VEGAN, or ANIMAL-FREE. Some worry about the negativity associated with animal rights groups, so veer from the usage of the word vegan on their product even though it might be vegan.

Remember now that all over Facebook and other social media platforms we often see claimed by vegans that VEGAN is a lifestyle, not a diet. So companies not especially keen on associating their product with a lifestyle shy away from that connection.

Many times a company that produces products made from flesh, blood and milk also offer a vegan option, so in their effort to satisfy the animal-eaters who are the main source of their customer base, vegan gets deleted and plant-based becomes the preferred wordage for labeling. They don’t want any of it to be political or social or debatable. They’re in business to make money, not social policy.

Face it. The government and slaughter industries have done a great job in demonizing vegans. Vegans have also contributed to that. PETA (People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals), probably was the biggest contributing factor by focusing on vivisection for so long, when nobody in the general population even knew what the word meant.

I recall many years ago when memberships were sent through the mail, on the form I had to fill out it asked if I would break the law for animal rights? Or something like that. Would I break the law was the main component of the question? That in itself alerted me to the possibility that PETA wasn’t all it claimed to be, and that just maybe the government was running that organization as a silent entity and wanted to know in advance who would break the law so they could monitor them.

I mean why would anybody ask that? I have to wonder too why PETA got into the rescue and kill business of animals. They didn’t need to do that. You can’t be everything. Ingrid Newkirk (long-time president of PETA) reportedly said, “but people always call us”. So what? Do you have a license and the permit to euthanize animals in your PETA office? Refer them elsewhere. I wouldn’t call my doctor’s office and demand that he do surgery right now. There are proper protocols and procedures and scheduling requirements.

I still think that the CIA has a foothold and influence in that organization and as long as they do, they will be associated with terror. The CIA is the largest terror organization in the world.

PETA gave the food companies a pass for a long time, probably to stay in existence, which is understandable given the climate of the time. However, their continued persistence in not caring who they exploit as long as they get their pro-animal voice heard continues to make investors and manufacturers skittish when putting their money on a product that carries a prejudice against all animal-eaters and even some plant-eaters.

How many times I saw the sexual exploitation of the female human used as justification for the cause. You need to be consistent across all lines if you want to be considered valid in your views and subsequent demands.

Humans are animals. You can’t hate one species and love all the others. If you love the predator species too, which you claim to do, then humans fall into that category – not by DNA design but by choice and in some instances survival.

Non-vegans expect vegans to be compassionate to all species, including the human, and this compassion often is not communicated toward non-vegans on social media. It is the non-vegan that vegans accuse of species-selection when caring about animals, but vegans do it too, by not showing the non-vegan the same compassion as they do other predator species.

Turning love into a requirement for animal welfare isn’t rational. Respecting an animal’s right to live out their lives in absence of enslavement, torture and slaughter elevates their right to exist for themselves, no others. Being dependent on your love turns them into objects.

Then again, vegan has become associated with gluten-free, GMO-free, processed food-free and on and on, so rather than deal with what has become the cumbersome vegan word, they prefer to go with plant-based.

All well and good. So what, as long as it doesn’t contain any animal products – at least for now. I’ve often used it myself.

The vegans, rightly so, also want to make the process vegan – anything to do with the manufacturing of the product. For example, they don’t want the habitats of animals destroyed to harvest a plant to make an animal-free product. Once a product passes all those tests, then they don’t want any testing of plant products on animals.

However, the ‘for now’ part is the pitfall. Even though most people will connect plant-based with no animal in it, meaning only plants, it doesn’t actually mean no animal, since it can also mean in addition to plants the product also contains some animal.

When you order a bowl of soup in a restaurant, you’ll ask if the broth is vegetable based or animal based. If it’s vegetable, you’re happy and can order the soup in relatively good conscience. But wait, you forgot to ask about those tiny meatballs floating in it, thinking if the broth is plant-based, then everything else in the soup must be also.

Not so. It’s the ‘based’ word that allows for flexibility. Maybe not now, but eventually someone will use that loophole to put animals where animals weren’t supposed to be. That’s the primary reason companies and manufacturers prefer it, in addition to the associated-activism they consider baggage.

In sum: labeling preferences by food companies and manufacturers are based on the meaning of the word based.


Who would have thought we had so many people wanting to be dictators in Congress? It’s my way or no way. Vote them out everybody says, but nobody does. These wannabe dictators are undermining the success of ‘we the people’ as a nation – one nation, not two or three or five or twenty. A separate nation for every ethnic group under one nation? Is that what you really mean?

We’re one nation under God. What does ‘under’ mean? It means all we who are under someone, beneath someone, are oppressed. We’re a nation of slaves. If we are under God, then God is our dictator. Which God though? Each religion has a different interpretation of their God, so which one are we the USA under? All of them?

I don’t want your God being my dictator and you don’t want my God being your dictator. But we all have to work somehow, someway, together, to keep our nation strong, healthy and safe from those within and without who want to harm us.

Cutting people’s heads off or committing state-imposed murder against someone else who murdered, eating the flesh, blood, and milk of any species we can capture, enslave, torture and slaughter, committing rape against any human available when you decide to feed your rage proves that humankind is not yet fit to live without walls. Humans have yet to demonstrate that they can be trusted to live among others absent wanting to do harm to one another.

Some people want to design the USA in the likeness of Europe. Everybody wants the country they live in to be like the country they left – only better. So what’s better than Europe for all those European descendants living in the USA as legal citizens?

The United States of America.

That’s what’s better than Europe – better than the place you left. You all made it better, so why now after all this time are you longing to be Europe again? You have 50 states you can move in and out of any time you get Border Fever.

How many countries does Europe have? Fifty, the same as the number of states we have. But wait. Some of those fifty European states are shared with countries outside of the European Union – in Asia. “Turkey, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Russia are considered to be “transcontinental” with portions of their countries on multiple continents.”

Is that what you’re looking for? You want the USA to become transcontinental? Do you want Mexico to become a state, so you don’t have to worry about the border? How about all the Middle America countries? Them too? Make them all states?

How big is Europe? Smaller than the USA and Canada combined, but it has three times as many people. So what are you missing? A smaller than the USA overcrowded-with-people piece of land? They all speak different languages. Every time you cross a border in Europe, the language changes. In the USA, except for the Spanish-speakers, everybody speaks English. That’s our national language.

But wait again. I’ve heard talk about the USA becoming bilingual, whereby everybody going to school must learn two languages, even that some want Spanish to be the national language. Now even I think that’s carrying your country with you too far. Stay where you are and clean up the mess you all were too complacent to do from the beginning, that made things got out of hand in the first place. You allowed it. Now you come here and want to fight for your rights by destroying what people before you built.

If I want to live in France, I don’t expect France to change their national language to English, just because I’m too lazy to learn French. If I want to survive and thrive, I’ll learn their language, not tell them to learn mine. How arrogant can one people be?

Hey, Europe doesn’t have a dessert, do they? Ops, not so. There’s one in Spain and a few dots of arid land here and there, but not like our dessert that spans many states. Hey, we even have palm trees. Mountains, Great Lakes, big oceans on east and west coasts. You want overcrowded dense cities, we got ’em. You want wide open spaces, we got ’em. You want big sky, it’s here. Europe is old and tired. We’re still young.

The USA has one currency. Even though Europe has the Euro, not all countries use it, so going from place to place on your Border Fever trip can get complicated.

No one in the USA needs a passport to travel between states. There are no border crossings. In Europe, even though they have a passport-free zone, it doesn’t include all countries, and you still need a passport in some places. If you’re stopped by police or if you board a plane you need to prove your identity, and the only acceptable form of ID are those issued by national authorities. So that has it’s problems leading to confusion too.

Maybe if this isn’t good enough for your ‘wanting to be better than Europe’ palate, then go back home. They’ll take you in – maybe. Give it a try. When you want to come back, the door will open if you qualify as a good citizen who wants no harm to come to the USA. Talking and doing are sometimes the same thing. Clean up your attitude and your talk about hating America and Americans and see if you don’t like the USA better than Europe.

You know, if people didn’t come to the USA illegally we wouldn’t need walls to keep them out. They don’t want to wait. They lack patience and the will to work for what they want. In all countries south of the USA border, they like dictators, they like coups. A coup means you get what you want fast. You take it. They do not like process. It’s their nature. It’s like the French and Arabs wanting to whack off everybody’s head whom they don’t like. It’s in their nature to respond swiftly with the most brutal force to get those who offend their sensibilities away from them – off the planet.

All these rape rooms all over the planet and somebody’s feelings get hurt when somebody calls them a cockroach. And then that’s what the news media forces the world to focus on for a week, instead of the real harm that’s happening to people all over the globe. Cockroaches hide their nests and only come out to scavenge for food, individually usually. Then if one gets squished, there’s no one else to give away their nest location, which is usually inside the walls or a place that nobody would think to look. They’re scavengers. And usually, do their scavenging activities at night when nobody can see them.

Spanish-speakers have their DNA stuck in socialistic politics and policies. Still, they want a dictator who will dole out what the people need so they can rise up as their own dictator in their neighborhood. Actually, dictators rise, they don’t get elected. Voting just makes it appear more legal. But you’ve seen one military coup after another.

They lack the patience for the process, so when they tire of waiting they strike like a snake and stage yet another coup. Coups come in many colors, shapes, and sizes. They know them all. They take pride in knowing them all. I mean, why does South America, Middle America, Mexico want to send their poor people to occupy the USA while everybody else stays back in the comfort of the nests, hidden behind their own walls of secrecy?

Because they can pick any state they want to live it and still be united as Spanish-speaking people. That’s the dictator/socialistic way of Spanish speakers taking care of their own, so they don’t have to actually bear the cost burden. The governments of these nations make arrangements to drive them out. Yes, you can take your kids. Good riddance. Have a happy life. Thank you, dictator God. Don’t forget to send us back some USA dollars. We won’t.


I write my truth as I experience it from all dimensions. I’m not a piece of candy nor a sedative.

Hey wild one, your number’s up. Is that good? What do you see? Yahoo censorship – not very democratic for a wholly democratic leaning news service. Removed my comment on Chelsea Handler – forty\something – bearing her breasts to get people to vote democratic is sexist and objectifies women. Yahoo evidently liked the idea of a woman objectifying herself.

If DNA can’t determine if a person is a Native American with any reliability, then how can it determine if somebody is a Jew?


When you’re tired, eating will not make you less tired, no matter what you eat. We often think we’re tired because we need to eat when it’s often eating that makes us tired. We want energy, so instinctively think more fuel in the tank will provide that. If your tank is full, and you’re still tired, then look at other ways of increasing your energy output, rather than adding more fuel to your tank. Don’t be fooled. That’s why people with anxiety eat a lot. It makes them tired, thus calmer. If you want quick energy, don’t eat unless you can afford about an hour of feeling sleepy or tired after you eat, because that’s what food does, all food. The digestion process is what slows you up.

Watering down prejudice and discrimination via name-calling. There’s a side effect aka adverse reaction to overusing words to describe objectionable behavior or to accuse people of certain objectionable behaviors. The professional media, as well as trolls of social media, are actually desensitizing the world to prejudice and discrimination by calling out everybody under the sun, more particularly the half human race, depending on which side of the fence you stand, for thinking and/or acting in a prejudicial and/or discriminatory way. Racist, misogynist, sexist, anti-gay, bigot, homophobe, ageist, including body-shaming and on and on. Obsessive name-calling has become the standard response to being criticized. It’s not just one name, it’s a whole barrel of names delivered shotgun-style to anyone whose opinions someone else doesn’t share. At some point, and we’ve probably reached that point, everyone gets hit or verbally beat up by someone for having a view somebody else doesn’t like. Rather than address the issue, it’s a lot easier to shoot somebody with a bunch of names to discredit their entire being and entire lives and everything about them. Talk about overkill? Well actually nobody is recognizing the effect of the overkill. Not yet. Eventually, those words will lose their sting. The strategy of repeating the same word over and over, trying to shut someone down from speaking will eventually shut the person down who’s using it for being over-bearing and manipulative, Okay, so it all got tossed up into the air – this new way of communicating one’s mind. Now as it settles think about how to renegotiate with yourself to communicate more effectively – the type of communication that produces results. Right now, everybody is on the negative side of the scale. They’re acting like the world is going to end tomorrow and they have to fix their lives right now. Well, if the world is going to end tomorrow, then why bother? Focus on that urgency and break that down into smaller components. WHY is Donald Trump the target of everyone’s obsession; think why only one person? Why do we think he can fix whatever happens in the world? Be honest. You wouldn’t be screaming at him if you thought anybody else had the answers, or the power or the will or the flexibility that you obviously think he has. That’s a huge tell, right there. Nobody is going after any congressperson or governor or senator or mayor or otherwise public figure. Maybe you have unrealistic expectations and that’s what’s making you all insane. Who else is there? If Hillary or Barak had any answers, don’t you think the responsible thing would be to circulate their solutions in detail to the populace? They know all the questions. Yet they don’t provide the answers. They want you to put them back in power or someone like them before they’ll help you with your social issues. What is that strategy all about? Getting elected. Period. They don’t have any answers, that’s why they can’t share them with the populace. They were already in office and they didn’t have the answers then. Hey, they say they couldn’t get it done. That’s a defeatist attitude. What they want is for the Republicans to all become Democrats, so they can all agree on what the Democrats want. But the Democrats don’t know what they want; that’s why they always delay. Big business writes the proposals, the bills, the laws. They’re like the pharmaceutical industry. They send out sales reps to all doctor offices and hospitals and clinics to sell a product after it’s been developed, tell the doctor the main benefits, side effects, offers a few personal perks, then they leave and the doctor/hospital/clinic passes it all on to the patient/consumer – except for the perks of course. The populace intuitively knows that Donald Trump is the only answer. There is nobody any better on the horizon. The USA government is sorely lacking in effective negotiators. Go ahead, ask Hillary for a detailed solution. Ask any person from any party for a detailed solution to any problem that exists – then and now. You will not get an answer that’s responsive to the question asked. You’ll get political posturing. Work with that knowledge for a while, then regroup.

THE FIRST HUMAN Where in Africa did the first human emerge? Why Africa? Why only in one location? If it was spontaneous, then spontaneous could happen simultaneously in many places under the same or similar conditions consisting of the same elements and forces. What were the land or sea boundaries where humans first occurred? What country would that be now? Was the first one a male or female or both? How did it reproduce? Did it emerge in water or on land? Was it an insect, a worm or a fish? Why do we long for a master in the sky that we can’t see? Why when we die do we say we’re going home? Was Noah’s Ark a space ship fleeing from a distant dying planet? Why did only humans evolve and not other animals, when nothing solitary exists in the universe? What was the first other animal on the planet and where did it emerge? What was the first plant and where did it emerge?

MANUFACTURED SAD Anger comes after SAD. We’re already at anger – for sometime now – which means we got out of SAD mode, as a nation once depressed. Stop trying to put us back to SAD, which will only result in more anger. Sad, anger, acceptance, happy, productive. Simultaneous would be nice. Yes, it’s possible. No one is required to wallow in stages of anything or slow-poke their way through each stage. You’re trying to lower the temperature by going back to SAD, instead of advancing to HAPPY via acceptance. Everything is SAD on social media now. Not long ago everybody was a racist bigot cunt, now they’re all so so SAD. Going back to SAD doesn’t lead to happy.  It keeps people in the past looking for a happy that’s gone. Stop with the reverse psychology engineering. It’s not working. You’re confusing people. Stop telling happy stories with a SAD component. What are you really trying to do here, except create more chaos and uncertainty? The social engineers created this social media monster, now step back and let people figure how to get out of it on their own. You made a mess trying to control people’s emotions. That’s oppression in case you can’t see it. The populace will turn on the social engineers. They’ll figure out who you are. People don’t like their food genetically engineered, what makes you think they want their emotions engineered by terrorist agencies with agendas to control them for somebody else’s benefit? They’re going to wake up and stop turning against each other, which was your socially engineered plan, and you will become their new target. Acceptance was the next step to happy and you all pushed everybody back to SAD. Now they’ve got to do that whole anger stint all over again. That’s sadistic and detrimental to society – AT ALL LEVELS. You have a price to pay. Getting out-of-the-way is your best strategy now.



THE SPANISH have this thing about opening other people’s doors. I live in a building with lots of Hispanics – some speak English, some don’t, some pretend not to. There’s a unit next to mine that the leasing office always fills with Hispanics when the previous tenants move out. And they all know each other. Not just the ones who live here, but the new ones coming in. It’s like a network of people with a common cause.

Invariably, when new tenants arrive they try to enter my unit. Again, and again and again. Not with a key, but by shaking the door knob till I go out and they always act the same way. In a rudimentary sign language with arms flailing and laughing noises and head slapping I get the impression that they did it by mistake.

But so often? It’s not a twist of the knob and ops, that’s not my door; it’s an aggressive let me in, who locked the door type of action.

Other times as someone walks by, they lean over and twist and shake the knob. Sometimes they bring a bunch of friends, shake the knob till I open it, then start laughing and pointing and shaking their heads as if I know what they’re doing. It’s like my Hispanic neighbor wants to show her friends? family? guests? my face? We finally got a security system, since they didn’t speak English and there was no way for us to know what their intentions were.

I believe that Amber Rene Guyger got off at the wrong floor and went into an apartment she thought was hers. She made a huge cultural blunder/mistake by not respecting boundaries. To the Spanish mind they shouldn’t exist. It’s part of their culture and their mindset. They don’t get the line drawn by somebody else’s personal space. They don’t see the line, even when there’s a door.

If not for my experience with Spanish speaking people trying to open my door, repeatedly, over years, I probably would have thought that her shooting a huge body mass approaching her in somebody else’s apartment late at night had sinister roots.

If anything should be on trial here it’s the Spanish/Hispanic culture – a clean up your culture moment for sure. Somebody is dead who should be alive.

However, given that she listed herself as ‘white’ on her police identification card, she is now going to have to address her Spanish roots. A few Spanish news outlets ran this story, which indicates to me, besides her appearance and cultural behavior, that she is indeed of Spanish ancestry, which explains the cultural behavior of opening doors because they’re there, or because they mistook the door for theirs.

I do not believe for a second that the incident right down to the opening of the door was premeditated. It was instinctual.

I’ve seen it – over and over and over and over again. The people are always, in every instance, Hispanic.


Continental Africa has fifty-four countries in it, more countries than any other continent, yet black Africans still want to inhabit every other place on earth. One of the most desired destinations is the USA.

Wouldn’t you think that after the horror of slavery, the USA would be the last place on earth black Africans would want to visit or live?

It doesn’t make any sense, such a resource-rich continent as Africa and everybody wants to move to the USA – or Europe will do. How many black Africans aspire to move to the Middle East, China or any other Asian country?

How about South America? Too much like home?

That’s usually what people want, too much like home to get homesick. Not them, they want different, big, better. Besides,  Africans and Spaniards don’t get along. Too much hustle interference – from both sides.

Asia’s big. Russia’s big. Middle East is big. They’re different.

Yeah, but not better.

There’s a lot of hatred coming out of black sectors worldwide these days toward all white people, blaming them for everything wrong in their lives, as if all the non-whites were robotic and had no say in any decisions regarding their lives. In other words, white people lived their lives for them. Why did they let them, if that’s what they think happened? And why do they continue to let them, if that’s what they think is happening now?

White people forced this, white people forced that, on all of us, as they moan and rock and raise their cords to a place meant only for worship, offering up, always up, praise to somebody they said left without saying goodbye .

In unison, nodding amens in agreement as a cohesive lament looking for a song lost as if the wind wrote it. It’s somewhere. Maybe they should follow their GOD – out of AFRICA. After all. They say God left.

Why do they want everyone to care?

I wonder if there weren’t any white people in the USA if they would still want to go there to visit or to live?

Probably not.

So how did this evolution thing work?

The evolutionary of humans who first emerged as black Africans in Africa. Where do white Africans fit in?

Oh, they don’t.

Well, white people came from some place. Oh, I get it.

White people are the black Africans who emigrated to what is now called Europe where they turned white from lack of sun. Oh-h, the Oreo cookie analogy turned inside out. A white Oreo cookie – black on the inside and white on the outside.

The black Africans who stayed were angry that members of their own tribe left. They never heard from them again?

Evidently some of them became Chinese and those who couldn’t decide which way to go ended up in the Middle East, because they kept back-tracking.

So Asians all came from Africa?


The American Indians emigrated from Asia.

Asians are black Africans who emigrated from Africa.

White people are black Africans who emigrated from Africa.

When the (American) Indians first met the Europeans in continental North America they thought it was an East meets West moment.

It was an Africa meets Africa moment. You can take the African out of Africa, but you can’t take Africa out of the African.

When black Africans fight against any individual or group, they fight against each other. It’s still that way on Continental Africa. Black on Black. In fact, it’s Black on Black everywhere – Asia, the two Americas, Africa, Europe, Australia, Antarctica and possibly new Zealand (the lost continent). Postscript: The above represents a simplified summary of truth, if you support the theory of evolution and the theory that human life began in a solitary location on the continent of Africa – when Noah’s arc landed on Planet Earth long ago.

3 LEVELS OF BLAME 1-  The one(s) who suggested the action. 2-  The one(s) who made the decision(s) to act. 3-  The one(s) who executed the action(s).

your opinion matters. let's hear it.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: