Categories
WHY

WHY AMERICA FIRST?

World leaders lose their tempers when America says ‘America First’. In their minds America is saying that all other countries don’t matter, that they come second or third or way down on the ladder or nowhere on the ladder. But doesn’t each of those complaining countries put their countries first? Of course they do.

Nobody respects a father or mother who puts outsiders first, rather than their own. Nobody on earth can put outsiders first and still be considered competent and respected heads of their families.

Some say, we can all be one happy world family. Just let us in, or give us your money, or your scientific and technological knowledge, open it all up to us. ‘It’s going to take too long to get what you have and we don’t want to spend all the required time catching up.’

So all these decades you all were enjoying the life of leisure swinging in your hammocks, while others, worlds away, worked to make living on earth easier and more productive for everyone. You wanted your way in your culture in your region in your time and everybody leave you alone. You didn’t want all that modern stuff. What happened? Now you do. So where have you been?

Your superior/supremacist attitude held you back. Your egos, big as cave openings, wouldn’t let you out. You think the more somebody acquires the more superior they are. It’s the ones who refused to change for the purpose of moving away from the cave life who are the real supremacists. They’re the ones who thought the old way was the only right way, wanting to keep living the way they always lived.

Your culture, instead of invention, ingenuity and progress, came first. You clung to your culture like a baby clings to a blanket.

You said leave us alone; get out of our spaces. Go back from where you came. Yet here you are losing your tempers because America finally said “America First”. We didn’t put America first for a long time. We shared our knowledge; our people paid with their wages to send people with skills, knowledge and supplies to help you build your nations, but still there were too many who wanted the old life – a life where people die young, where they suffer without knowledge on how best to survive.

You didn’t want to be catapulted into the modern world. The issue was the catapult; it was too sudden. But it didn’t have to be if you had stopped with all that meaningless cultural supremacy. There’s not much value in anything that comes under the label of culture. It’s a bunch of traditions that hurt more than help – in almost every instance. Everything else comes under the labels of ‘living’ and ‘progressing’ or ‘dying’.

In short, you didn’t want to do the work of it, even when you were shown how and given the tools and the funds. You still found a way to muck it up.

So what have you all done for America, except make continuous demands on America’s people, their resources, knowledge and experience?

There’s a growing trend that expects America to become a welfare state absorbing the poor people of other nations, because they have more money than their countries of origin, while supplying financial aid and services to those nations of origin as well as to others.

If America becomes filled with people with low paying jobs, and everybody gets the same benefits, with no incentives to create something better, how will these Americans pay enough taxes to send money and other aid to all the countries it currently subsidizes? Does Cuba send aid all over the world? How far back on the evolutionary scale of development do you want to go?

How will America be a military to all countries who want protection if America can’t afford a military? Socialism can only sustain it’s own people for a limited amount of time, turning America into a welfare state capable of only sustaining itself.

World leaders need to think twice before attacking the American system that helps to feed their people and keep them free by providing subsidies off the backs of the American worker.

Yes. In order to keep sharing what we have with the world, we need to keep progressing and to take care of our own first. It is the citizens who pay out of their pay checks in taxes to supplement economies of over two hundred nations worldwide. Regionally, Africa receives 32 percent of all U.S. aid, followed by the Middle East at 31 percent and South and Central Asia at 25 percent. Afghanistan receives the most.

In the meanwhile, all classes of working Americans subsidizing the economies of other nations, so they can survive and thrive, deserve a thank you from all those countries benefiting from their hard work and sacrifice.

So, again, what have you given the hard working American people, except your demands and disrespect? Think on that.






Categories
WHY

SEX IN THE STALL

You claim to be out of the closet, but you still have sex in public restroom stalls.

Why?

Gay parks? I didn’t know they existed, till I moved to the West Side of Cleveland. Beautiful on-the-lake park, well-kept. Gays only. No need for a posted sign claiming dominance over this park, or that restaurant or those bars.

Families can’t go to some parks on Lake Erie, because everybody’s having sex in cars – in broad daylight. Or, pick up and drop off young boys waiting to make some fast cash.

Looking for a pick up? Want to state your preferred sexual style?

The car says it all. Hood up. Trunk up. One or two side doors open. Four doors open. All up and open. Pick your preference. Various cars sporting various sex styles. A communique.

Public restrooms, public restaurants, public parks should be public for everybody.

Gays stake their claim and everybody else leaves.

Why?

Because of inappropriate behavior in public spaces. Non-gays don’t want to be around what most non-gays consider private, not public.

There’s only one required qualification for squatting rights. Can we have sex there? Or can we pick up and drop off without incident?

Out of the closet, means you don’t have to have sex there. All tax payers fund those parks.

Too cheap to get a room? Don’t want to bring your recent pick-up date home to your apartment?

But guess what? Gay motels exist too. What constitutes a gay motel? Motels are places people go to have sex. So what? It’s private. Isn’t it?

Gays are more comfortable around their own. Just like Africans and Hispanics and Chinese, and Indian et al and women and men and children, the young, the old, the middle-aged, rich, poor, in-between. We all have our categories.

  • You thought I left out white people. White people aren’t comfortable around anyone. They are independently-minded. They don’t want to depend on anyone for their success. Why? Because they inherently don’t trust each other or anyone else.

While in public, playing the integration game, there’s a baseline behavior paradigm that everyone for everyone’s comfort abides by.

Yet, segments of each group feel, think they should be able to be themselves, no matter where they be at any moment. Au naturel movements create problems, when they speak for everyone in the category through their loud, contrary actions.

Stereotypes are formed by these contrarians wanting to act out out in public spaces and expect everybody else to accept who they are and how they act. Well, who you are is not necessarily how you act. Chew on that. It’s called exhibitionist behavior. That’s what non-exhibitionists avoid.

Yet, gay parks, restaurants, bars, motels do exist. So stereotype or not, the facts on the ground support it.

Maybe gays aren’t yet fully out of the closet and have over such a long time been groomed in the closet that they don’t understand how to act in public when out of the closet. They had to hide their sex. Coming out of the closet thus means to have sex in public.

Closet=closed. Public=open.

Discretion doesn’t mean using the bathroom stall instead of the bar stool. Come on. You need to be discreet in public places, just like non-gays need to be discreet in public places. If you can’t delay gratification till you get home, or to a motel, then that needs to change. The world isn’t going to keep accepting all the flaws that you are too lazy to discipline.

SAFE to GAYS in public places, actually means safe to have sex in public places – and not be negatively judged or beaten up for it.

At least be honest while you’re protesting for your rights.

That’s not one of them.

Reserve a stall in a public restroom?? For two people??

No.






 

Categories
WHY

3 LEVELS OF BLAME

3 LEVELS OF BLAME

1-  The one(s) who suggested the action.

2-  The one(s) who made the decision(s) to act.

3-  The one(s) who executed the action(s).






 

Categories
WHY

Slaughter Is Not A Deterrent To Slaughter

from What Happened Yesterday (W.H.Y.)

A holocaust can be the sacrificing of one or a billion and one or more – with the feigned, always the feigned, purpose of making a better life for those not sacrificed.

The letting of the blood of a lamb, the burning of a witch, burning humans corralled in locked barns in Africa, aerial bombing of Gaza after the borders are sealed, death by concentration camps around Europe, suicide bombers, the mass slaughter of Native Americans – north and south – the slaughter of aborigines in Australia, the skinning of Albinos and Pygmies, every soldier worldwide, trained to kill the youth of another nation, medical experiments on other breeds and species, reserving the good healthy foods and medicines and medical procedures for the privileged, while giving what’s leftover to the underprivileged, and the billions slaughtered every year, that the privileged duped you into thinking would preserve you in body, mind and spirit if you ate them.

Unclench THAT fist before God unclenches it for you. That’s some high priced preservative that you’re using to line the pockets of the wealthy, while they keep you addicted to the blood.

So, where did all this slaughter get the world? Are we healthier, wealthier, wiser? Are we a world without war? Did a Native Indian girl jumping to her death from the top of a waterfall lift an evil spell, or did your conscience need to make something positive out of something horrible, so you urged her to jump to make the sun shine again?

Superstitions stem mostly from women, who aren’t allowed an education, so they make up cause and effect as they go along. Fifty-fifty – the sun will shine. We’ll win some favors from the tribe for that one. They’ll think we have magical powers – better magical powers than no powers. She was a dog anyway.

War doesn’t stop war, so why do it? After all the wars, all the holocausts, the massacres, call it what it is – mass death – we’re still warring. So, war isn’t a deterrent to war. Death isn’t a deterrent to death. Only life can deter death. No war deters war.

Do we have cures that don’t cause another equally debilitating illness? You gotta be kidding me. All these decades of medical slaughter experiments and still no cure? Man…you’ve been going down the road most travelled, and every traveler will tell you, they’re weary. Weary means nothing new. Same ol’, same ol’. So why take that road again? Get off your fat tush or skinny bones and do something different – for Your sake.

Conservatives don’t want the Federal government interfering with individual state economies, or any other areas, yet they’re the first ones to run to the Fed, when their states need money. So in essence, they want the Feds to be their personal banker, with no conditions on how they spend the money.

The Cleveland Clinic is evolving backwards to the seventies, to a diet that didn’t work then, and won’t work now. The Ketosis diet, basically the Atkins diet, high animals, low carbs and fat, put your body in a state of pre-death to lose weight. Well…yeah, most people do lose weight just before they die. So why focus on death to survive? Why, why, why? Because the slaughter industries fund the programs. Slaughter industries fund a whole lot of stuff that clinics and hospitals do. Why go around claiming to be the best, state of the art, progressive, new thinking, new age, when you’re still back in the dark ages?

You don’t have to slaughter a life to save a life. Yet, the burger joints of America have such a strong hold on, not only what we eat, but what the researchers are allowed to study, that the researchers would rather put you in a state of pre-death, so you can still eat the meat, that the burger joints dictate us to eat, all the while, dictating to the hospitals that are supposed to make you well, what diet to put you on to lose the weight they caused in the first place. Their solution? More meat. Eat more of what’s killing you, just remove the fat from it, and stop drinking liquids. Even they admit that it’s only short term. So then the people on pre-death diets, gain it all back and then some. How insane is that?

Why does Obama keep blaming the poor people in America for the collapsed economy? Bad home loans to people who couldn’t afford them. The banks didn’t loan out one million dollars a year for one million years – twice – to the poor people in the USA. [That’s the price of the bail out] If so, they’d all be rich.

The primary purpose of having a congress is to prevent a dictatorship of the executive. When the populace doesn’t trust congress, that’s a ‘tell’ that the populace is agitated. [Notice that I didn’t say, that’s a ‘tell’ that the natives are restless?]

Dylan Ratigan says that prejudiced people shouldn’t be allowed in political parties unless the political party first shames them, and the political party renounces hatred toward blacks and Jews. The party under scrutiny was the Tea Bag party. Ratigan kicked the guy he was interviewing off the stage because he refused to give a yes or no answer to whether he would do that.

Aside from the subject matter that got lost in the verbal scuffle, this was a perfect example of how not to have a conversation. Ratign justified his actions, because it was his show and the interviewee wasn’t being cooperative, in that he wasn’t answering the questions in the way Ratigan wanted them answered. Ratigan was acting like a prosecutorial attorney who owned the show, thus the context of the conversation. After he literally turned his back on the interviewee, he went on a tirade, saying, ‘this is what happens when you try to have a conversation’.

Again, subject matter aside, Ratigan was having anything but a conversation. He didn’t like the guy or his politics, so he went on the attack, claiming by his actions, his own superiority.

To affect change, having a conversation means no bullying. If you have to cry that it’s your show, and you ask the questions, and then demand that they be answered in the words you choose for the interviewee, you’ve lost your argument simply because of your method.

Now, to the subject matter. If you ban people with prejudice from political parties, then what you’re saying is that people with prejudice should be banned from voting. What you demand from one political party must be demanded from all political parties for your argument to be valid. Yet, even if the argument is valid, in that the same rules apply to everyone, the rules are still prejudicial. I’ve never heard leaders of political parties ban people with prejudice. Where do you want these prejudiced people to go – to the democratic party? You didn’t think through the argument.

Raising the roof on prejudice means exposing it, not exploding the person who harbors it.

If people with prejudice were banned, you’d have to ban everyone. Your own prejudice against people with prejudice was difficult to watch. Don’t turn your back – engage. You let your anger get the best of you. I found it interesting that you focused on blacks and Jews. If blacks wanted to be in the Tea Bag party, they’d be there. Obviously, the Tea Bag platform doesn’t appeal to them. If your demand is simply going to be to publicly shame, and then you’ve done your job, and then go on with business as usual, then what’s the point? Most blacks still won’t like their platform.

Regarding the Jews. Lots of the Tea Baggers are Jews. Aside from that, Jews are the least discriminated against people on the planet. Oh, sure, they may not be liked by a lot of people for their own personal group platform, but Jews are overall, worldwide, the most successful people on the planet. You really don’t need to cry prejudice on their behalf. What you should be doing is picking up on their prejudices.

Jews are a protected class of people in all branches of government and business – all walks of life. No other group has that kind of clout. All things get filtered through the prism of Jews, before it gets to anybody else. Every other group is inferior to that class. All policy emanates from Jews. If you catch a break, it’s because your plight was making them look bad. That’s the only reason. I have not seen one person of influence stand up to that dictatorship – an underground, above ground network, where all it takes is a phone call to ruin your life for criticizing them, not for calling them a Jew, though that’s severe enough, you know, it’s tantamount to telling the enemy where you are, but for pointing out their flaws, for that you die. That’s their bottom line.

Calm down, then break the argument down, or forget your approach altogether. You started talking about anger and rage in the USA. Yet, instead of getting heated up over the cause, you slammed the result – which got you nowhere. I understand your frustration. People answer your questions with talking points that have nothing to do with the questions asked. But, you have your own talking points. Somebody wrote your script. And somebody’s talking in your ear.

Chris Matthews is not a good role model for you. All we ever hear is his opinion. Why even have a guest, if he’s not going to let the person answer the question? It’s time to retire hardball. Everybody plays it–and all it amounts to – at the end of the day – all things being equal in a perfect world, without rushing to judgement – that it is what it is – been there done that – deja vu all over again – on so many different levels. When the other shoe drops, where the sun doesn’t shine, that’s the bottom line. If it walks like a duck, wears lipstick and if the shoe fits, then the moment of truth has arrived. The fat lady hasn’t sung yet, so it appears to be DOA – dead on arrival.

Lars Vilks aka cartoonist created nothing but trouble in his art. He’s an old Swedish Jew with a grudge against dogs and religions. One is said to be the best friend to all humans and the other, their saviors. He wanted to wipe those two bad thoughts off the face of the planet, instead he managed to get a few hundred people killed. Whoa. The power of an image. Why would anyone even want to save a guy like that? Nothing to do with him or his character or lack of integrity. It was all about Muslims – hating Muslims. Everybody  in law enforcement hates Muslims, so why not jump on this bandwagon and save the cartoonist.

Their reason was different than mine. I don’t support slaughter, period. They all do. And they all wanted to get the Muslims who were threatening to kill the cartoonist, again, not because it was Lars Vilks, but because it was the Muslims behind making the threats.

Or so they thought. The Jews sensationalized the threats against the cartoonist, because they were sure the Arabs were behind them. After all the money and human hours spent to make this prejudiced man, who has the blood of humans and dogs on his hands, safe, only to discover that the two main instigators were American women was a huge blow to Israeli pride.

The FBI can’t be very happy about this one. And both women are part Jew – double blow. I guess Lula DeSilva is going to have to rethink his blue-eyed stereotype talk. The Feds kept mentioning blond hair and blue eyes, like they were somehow evil colors. You won that one Lula, but for all the wrong reasons. Having blond hair and blue eyes is nothing to be ashamed of. People shouldn’t have to feel worried, because the color of their hair and eyes match someone else’s, who wants to raise holy hell against a cartoonist, who feels betrayed by dogs and religions, or because someone clumps all blue-eyed people with terrorism against the populace. Blue-eyed has become code for white people – or Jews, only if the shoe fits, or WASPS – or hillbillies (?) We’re all the same to some dark-eyed, dark skinned, dark haired people. They can criticize us, but we can’t criticize them. We’re those blond hair, stupid monster people, you know, the ones with straw for brains.

Rachael Maddow told us we all fit the terrorist profile – to take the focus off the Jews. There was only one being on the planet that didn’t fit the profile and that was a stuffed animal – according to Rachael. I wonder what that was code for? You may fit the profile RM, and you may even like that you fit the profile, but keep me out of your circle of terrorists. I don’t fit anybody’s profile of terror. I’m the Five Principles to Peace without prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter – which means a better life for all. Or did you not believe the principled peace part?

There are lots of peace-loving, peace-seeking people in the world, who do not fit your terrorist profile, but you don’t like that do you? The Jews want everyone to fit the profile, so they can keep spying on everyone, because in the end, you just can’t help yourselves. I say that any group that claims, not to be able to help themselves, who claims that they need an urgent intervention to keep them from blowing up themselves and the planet, need to get off the T.V. and voluntarily separate themselves from society, to keep them from harming that society.

Dogs are like people – different breeds, different temperaments, different skills, different sizes, colors, types of hair. My dog is best friend to me – not to everyone else. Why do people think that just because she’s a dog, she’s their best friend? It doesn’t work that way. She is what she is, because I am what I am, and vice versa. We have a bond and a mutual understanding, that has nothing to do with food, or the way either of us looks. Dogs are proud of who they are and what they are. Why can’t humans be that too? Why do they have to be like every other dog, in every other way?






Categories
WHY

A HOLOCAUST FOR LAND

A HOLOCAUST FOR LAND

I recall that way back in the 9-11 days, some, or maybe one (and the others who thought it, thought better about not speaking it), voiced that it must take a lot of courage to blow one’s self up, knowing the horrible death they would suffer.

That does take courage – a lot of courage. No matter how hardened you are, it takes a lot of courage, because when you’re pre-planning it, then do the ritual thing prior to the deed, getting ready for it, and everybody is supporting you (when they never did before), for the group, family, the cause, as the time draws near, it’s only you – you ending your life – a life that your family, or your group, or their political, or religious cause, says needs to be done – and they elected you to do it, even though you volunteered.

Oh, they make you think that it was your idea, and how so brave – protecting them, and the children, the generations to come. You be the sacrifice – so we all can live a better life. See you in heaven, son – daughter. Teenagers, thinking the only way they can change the world is to kill themselves so that others will live better.

Not unlike in the USA, parents being so proud of their sons and daughters who go off to war to kill or to be killed – for their parents, for the preservation of the next generation, for the family, the country, the community, the cause of freedom. After all, we can’t be free unless we’re courageous enough to kill or be killed – to slaughter or be slaughtered for our God-given right to be free.

I am recalling again, but now in the present day – not many days ago – people talking about how courageous Benjamin Netanyahu was for slaughtering the Palestinians – the Palestinians who had no way – no effective way – of defending themselves against the holocaust that he in conjunction with the USA administration and military, waged against them. But they’re trying to kill us, is what Netanyahu kept implying, as he slaughtered them – again – again – again…

It didn’t take courage for Netanyahu to bomb an entire country of people, who were actually born, bred – right there in Palestine – living there for centuries.  Recall, it’s called Palestine, where the Palestinians grew. It’s not called Israel on any old map I’ve ever seen.

It doesn’t take courage for another president of the USA to bomb Iraq – again – … It never takes courage when you’re the bully. Think about it. You see a picture of the poor and wretched in Palestine – also some rich folks. But see the difference between Israel and Palestine and any sane person would have to conclude that one of the two is enslaving the other.

It all comes down to ownership. Ownership of land, of resources, and they don’t give a flying fig about the degenerates living on the land they want to own.

The Jews for decades have been saying that they don’t want Gaza. Then why enslave the Gazan people – making sure that they never develop that land? It has nothing to do with rockets lobbed with no destination, nor teenagers throwing rocks at military tanks. Of course the Jews want Gaza’s prime real estate. A seaside resort. The Jews covet that tiny strip of land.

They don’t want peace – they want land – the more the better. It’s all about Hamas they say. It used to be all about Hezbollah. It’s always all about somebody not giving them what they want – land.

The fight to gain Jerusalem has nothing to do with a so-called Holy site – there’s nothing Holy about their agenda – they hate Jesus – want nothing to do with a Jew telling another Jew to treat the prostitutes well – to turn the other cheek at an insult – to give without expectation of a favor in return – it’s about land – and they’ll pull every rabbit out of the hat to make the world think they’re dying as a race, they’re dying due to persecution, they’re dying because they hate themselves – because the whole world hates them – and give us this God damned land – or else you’ll make us do something horrible to you.

That ‘something horrible’ is called in everybody else’s sane mind – absent theirs – a holocaust.

A holocaust for land.

ISRAEL is preparing to retake GAZA.






Categories
WHY

You Can Take The African Out Of Africa, But…

Continental Africa has fifty-four countries in it, more countries than any other continent, yet black Africans still want to inhabit every other place on earth. One of the most desired destinations is the USA.

Wouldn’t you think that after the horror of slavery, the USA would be the last place on earth black Africans would want to visit or live?

It doesn’t make any sense, such a resource-rich continent as Africa and everybody wants to move to the USA – or Europe will do. How many black Africans aspire to move to the Middle East, China or any other Asian country?

How about South America? Too much like home?

That’s usually what people want, too much like home to get homesick. Not them, they want different, big, better. Besides,  Africans and Spaniards don’t get along. Too much hustle interference – from both sides.

Asia’s big. Russia’s big. Middle East is big. They’re different.

Yeah, but not better.

There’s a lot of hatred coming out of black sectors worldwide these days toward all white people, blaming them for everything wrong in their lives, as if all the non-whites were robotic and had no say in any decisions regarding their lives. In other words, white people lived their lives for them. Why did they let them, if that’s what they think happened? And why do they continue to let them, if that’s what they think is happening now?

White people forced this, white people forced that, on all of us, as they moan and rock and raise their cords to a place meant only for worship, offering up, always up, praise to somebody they said left without saying goodbye .

In unison, nodding amens in agreement as a cohesive lament looking for a song lost as if the wind wrote it. It’s somewhere. Maybe they should follow their GOD – out of AFRICA. After all. They say God left.

Why do they want everyone to care?

I wonder if there weren’t any white people in the USA if they would still want to go there to visit or to live?

Probably not.


So how did this evolution thing work?

The evolutionary of humans who first emerged as black Africans in Africa. Where do white Africans fit in?

Oh, they don’t.

Well, white people came from some place. Oh, I get it.

White people are the black Africans who emigrated to what is now called Europe where they turned white from lack of sun. Oh-h, the Oreo cookie analogy turned inside out. A white Oreo cookie – black on the inside and white on the outside.

The black Africans who stayed were angry that members of their own tribe left. They never heard from them again?

Evidently some of them became Chinese and those who couldn’t decide which way to go ended up in the Middle East, because they kept back-tracking.

So Asians all came from Africa?

Hm-m-m.

The American Indians emigrated from Asia.

Asians are black Africans who emigrated from Africa.

White people are black Africans who emigrated from Africa.

When the (American) Indians first met the Europeans in continental North America they though it was an East meets West moment.

It was an Africa meets Africa moment. You can take the African out of Africa, but you can’t take Africa out of the African.

When black Africans fight against any individual or group, they fight against each other. It’s still that way on Continental Africa.

Black on Black. In fact, it’s Black on Black everywhere – Asia, the two Americas, Africa, Europe, Australia, Antarctica and possibly new Zealand (the lost continent).

Postscript: The above represents a simplified summary of truth, if you support the theory of evolution and the theory that human life began in a solitary location on the continent of Africa – when Noah’s arc landed on Planet Earth long ago.






 

Categories
WHY

Manipulation

Humans are adept at manipulating other humans, but inept at manipulating themselves.

Why?

Manipulation involves sneaky behaviors and actions that we cannot hide from ourselves.

How do you trick yourself into being manipulated?

You can’t, because you know the scheme; you’re it’s author.




 

Categories
WHY

AMBER RENE GUYER IS INNOCENT of premeditated murder – Why?

RE: AMBER RENE GUYGER

THE SPANISH have this thing about opening other people’s doors. I live in a building with lots of Hispanics – some speak English, some don’t, some pretend not to. There’s a unit next to mine that the leasing office always fills with Hispanics when the previous tenants move out. And they all know each other. Not just the ones who live here, but the new ones coming in. It’s like a network of people with a common cause.

Invariably, when new tenants arrive they try to enter my unit. Again, and again and again. Not with a key, but by shaking the door knob till I go out and they always act the same way. In a rudimentary sign language with arms flailing and laughing noises and head slapping I get the impression that they did it by mistake.

But so often? It’s not a twist of the knob and ops, that’s not my door; it’s an aggressive let me in, who locked the door type of action.

Other times as someone walks by, they lean over and twist and shake the knob. Sometimes they bring a bunch of friends, shake the knob till I open it, then start laughing and pointing and shaking their heads as if I know what they’re doing. It’s like my Hispanic neighbor wants to show her friends? family? guests? my face? We finally got a security system, since they didn’t speak English and there was no way for us to know what their intentions were.

I believe that Amber Rene Guyger got off at the wrong floor and went into an apartment she thought was hers. She made a huge cultural blunder/mistake by not respecting boundaries. To the Spanish mind they shouldn’t exist. It’s part of their culture and their mindset. They don’t get the line drawn by somebody else’s personal space. They don’t see the line, even when there’s a door.

If not for my experience with Spanish speaking people trying to open my door, repeatedly, over years, I probably would have thought that her shooting a huge body mass approaching her in somebody else’s apartment late at night had sinister roots.

If anything should be on trial here it’s the Spanish/Hispanic culture – a clean up your culture moment for sure. Somebody is dead who should be alive.

However, given that she listed herself as ‘white’ on her police identification card, she is now going to have to address her Spanish roots. A few Spanish news outlets ran this story, which indicates to me, besides her appearance and cultural behavior, that she is indeed of Spanish ancestry, which explains the cultural behavior of opening doors because they’re there, or because they mistook the door for theirs.

I do not believe for a second that the incident right down to the opening of the door was premeditated. It was instinctual.

I’ve seen it – over and over and over and over again. The people are always, in every instance, Hispanic.






Categories
WHY

The First Human

Where in Africa did the first human emerge?

Why Africa?

Why only in one location?

If it was spontaneous, then spontaneous could happen simultaneously in many places under the same or similar conditions consisting of the same elements and forces.

What were the land or sea boundaries where humans first occurred?

What country would that be now?

Was the first one a male or female or both?

How did it reproduce?

Did it emerge in water or on land?

Was it an insect, a worm or a fish?

Why do we long for a master in the sky that we can’t see?

Why when we die do we say we’re going home?

Was Noah’s Ark a space ship fleeing from a distant dying planet?

Why did only humans evolve and not other animals, when nothing solitary exists in the universe?

What was the first other animal on the planet and where did it emerge?

What was the first plant and where did it emerge?






 

Categories
WHY

COWARDS EAT COWS. WHAT’S ON YOUR PLATE?

People want you to do what they’re doing. It makes them feel more comfortable if you’re as fat as they are, or at least if you’re dining out together, that you eat as much as they do. Or eat the same kinds of food. Or drink the same drinks. Smoke the same cigarettes, wear the same clothes, watch the same movies. What no alcohol? A zillion stories flow and none of them are designed at that moment to make you feel good.

What, no meat? What’s an animal? You said you were animal-free, is that the same as vegan? I didn’t know milk and cheese were animals. Yeah, well if it contains the cells of an animal, it’s an animal. What’s a cell? Milk and cheese don’t have feelings. Cows can’t feel. Then why do you keep saying they’re happy? I don’t care if they’re happy or sad, I like cheese. Nobody cares, so why do you? Don’t you want a bite of my juicy steak? That’s not blood. No, it isn’t. It’s not the same thing. Cows can’t think.

What do you want a pat on the back? Pity? Everybody’s looking for pity these days, and they’re getting a shit load of it. That’s right a truckload of bull shit, human shit, chicken shit, who cares where it came from if it looks and smells like shit. It’s all a lie.

Non-vegan people say they admire vegans. No, they don’t. When you admire someone, you want to be them. You can’t, so you copy their behavior. Everybody tried to look like Marilyn Monroe. Why? Because they wanted to be like her, so they tried to look like her. People lie when they say they admire someone they don’t try to emulate. The two don’t fit.

Oh, I wish I could be a vegan, but I couldn’t.

What these people can’t do is be the outsider in the group, family, work, church, bar. When you walk in, others move away. You remind them of what they want to be but YOU CAN’T? It’s the rejection you can’t take. It’s not the food. Turn your nose up to a plant, but not to dismembering a cow and gorging on the flesh and blood?

At least be honest about it. You’ve heard what people say.

Why? You don’t care why. Because if you cared, you’d have to tell yourself the truth. And that great person you always thought you were disappears. Only for as long as it takes you to make a correction in your life, though. You can get that great person back, without cannibalizing anybody, and feel much better about confronting the WHY and acting on it.

Go ahead, give it a try, ask yourself WHY.







 

Categories
WHY

Side Effects Of Overusing Words

Watering down prejudice and discrimination via name-calling. There’s a side effect aka adverse reaction to overusing words to describe objectionable behavior or to accuse people of certain objectionable behaviors. The professional media, as well as trolls of social media, are actually desensitizing the world to prejudice and discrimination by calling out everybody under the sun, more particularly the half human race, depending on which side of the fence you stand, for thinking and/or acting in a prejudicial and/or discriminatory way. Racist, misogynist, sexist, anti-gay, bigot, homophobe, ageist, including body-shaming and on and on.

Obsessive name-calling has become the standard response to being criticized. It’s not just one name, it’s a whole barrel of names delivered shotgun-style to anyone whose opinions someone else doesn’t share. At some point, and we’ve probably reached that point, everyone gets hit or verbally beat up by someone for having a view somebody else doesn’t like. Rather than address the issue, it’s a lot easier to shoot somebody with a bunch of names to discredit their entire being and entire lives and everything about them. Talk about overkill? Well actually nobody is recognizing the effect of the overkill. Not yet.

Eventually, those words will lose their sting. The strategy of repeating the same word over and over, trying to shut someone down from speaking will eventually shut the person down who’s using it for being over-bearing and manipulative,

Okay, so it all got tossed up into the air – this new way of communicating one’s mind. Now as it settles think about how to renegotiate with yourself to communicate more effectively – the type of communication that produces results. Right now, everybody is on the negative side of the scale. They’re acting like the world is going to end tomorrow and they have to fix their lives right now. Well, if the world is going to end tomorrow, then why bother?

Focus on that urgency and break that down into smaller components.

WHY is Donald Trump the target of everyone’s obsession; think why only one person? Why do we think he can fix whatever happens in the world? Be honest. You wouldn’t be screaming at him if you thought anybody else had the answers, or the power or the will or the flexibility that you obviously think he has. That’s a huge tell, right there.

Nobody is going after any congressperson or governor or senator or mayor or otherwise public figure. Maybe you have unrealistic expectations and that’s what’s making you all insane. Who else is there? If Hillary or Barak had any answers, don’t you think the responsible thing would be to circulate their solutions in detail to the populace? They know all the questions. Yet they don’t provide the answers. They want you to put them back in power or someone like them before they’ll help you with your social issues. What is that strategy all about? Getting elected. Period. They don’t have any answers, that’s why they can’t share them with the populace. They were already in office and they didn’t have the answers then.

Hey, they say they couldn’t get it done. That’s a defeatist attitude. What they want is for the Republicans to all become Democrats, so they can all agree on what the Democrats want. But the Democrats don’t know what they want; that’s why they always delay. Big business writes the proposals, the bills, the laws. They’re like the pharmaceutical industry. They send out sales reps to all doctor offices and hospitals and clinics to sell a product after it’s been developed, tell the doctor the main benefits, side effects, offer a few personal perks, then they leave and the doctor/hospital/clinic passes it all on to the patient/consumer – except for the perks of course.

The populace intuitively knows that Donald Trump is the only answer. There is nobody any better on the horizon. The USA government is sorely lacking in effective negotiators.

Go ahead, ask Hillary for a detailed solution. Ask any person from any party for a detailed solution to any problem that exists – then and now. You will not get an answer that’s responsive to the question asked. You’ll get political posturing.

Work with that knowledge for a while, then regroup.